@ericmann Maybe my expectations are lower than others or I’m just happy to go along for the ride with characters I love, but I’m generally entertained by all the new series. I’m able to separate opinions and inconsistencies from my enjoyment of the stories.
@ramsey Being disappointed in how a certain character or scenario turned out doesn't limit my ability to enjoy the overall story. I've been absolutely thrilled about all the new series. Even Lower Decks has been pretty fun in an odd kind of way.
Lower Decks is... not the style of humor I look for generally, but the little references and easter eggs make up for that. Plus, I loved Orville (which was a love letter to Trek) despite similar humor, so I ain't that fancy.
@ericmann @ramsey Paris always held such promise since we don't generally see actual convicted criminals (and how they're treated by 24th century Earth). His intro which showed a rehabilitation focused corrections system set up some world building
and later intersected the Maqui in interesting ways.
I think they didn't quite deliver on that promise long-term well enough, and we shall not speak of the transwarp episode, but he was fun enough.
Now... Harry Kim is underrated.
I remember someone bashing "Moonfall" before it even came out based on the trailer. I believe the complaint was "that's not how any of this works" and requiring going beyond the usual level of "suspension of disbelief" from sci-fi.
I can't remember if it was you or @mwop, but I'm pretty sure it was one of you...
Did any of you end up watching it? :)
(It's been on my mind since I recently watched it with the fam)
@ramsey @ericmann @mwop I grew up getting hyped about "ID4" back in the day. Seeing "Moonfall" being attached to Roland Emmerich set my expectations correctly. I wasn't as hyped to see it, but it looked unbelievable in a fun way. I told Bec & Luke it would be "funny," but couldn't really explain why. Just asked Bec now if I was right to say it would be "funny," and she said yeah. Based on the trailer, both Bec and Luke thought it would be more serious and intense.
@ramsey @ericmann @mwop If you can stomach watching the trailer again – assuming you have any interest in doing so – look for signs that it isn't just straight up "the moon is falling because our science is bad."
It was subtle and maybe buried too much in some trailers. They were probably trying to keep as much of the details about the true nature of everything going on a surprise as possible.
The clues were there, at least in the trailers I saw. Maybe easily missed?
@ericmann @ramsey @mwop LOL, same. There was an aspect in the trailer that I felt gave the movie some potential wiggle room. I don't think it should have negated the pre-seen critique entirely (it was still quite ridiculous), it definitely played out how I thought it would and in my opinion gave the "physics" and "science" a lot of leeway.
@ramsey I'm afraid I saw Picard very differently. It went way off the rails in the last half of this season, IMHO.
But I do agree that Strange, New Worlds made a very, very good beginning. I'm really looking forward to following it. Telling a complete story each episode is definitely the way Star Trek is best suited. And I can't imagine a universe, past, present, or future without Star Trek.
Open source. Open community. We are dedicated to building and enriching the PHP community.